[Python-talk] using old .pyc files
Bill Sconce
sconce at in-spec-inc.com
Fri Aug 25 11:41:24 EDT 2006
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:05:39 -0400
Python <python at venix.com> wrote:
> At the close of the meeting, the question was raised about using old
> compiled python modules with a newer version of Python.
>
> Using an old compiled python module with a newer version of Python does
> not work. The Python interpreter checks a "magic number" looking for a
> version match. I suspect the main issue would be the compiled libraries
> that get used in the background. I tested using a 2.3.3 pyc against the
> 2.4.3 interpreter. You should be OK with minor upgrades (e.g.2.3.3 to
> 2.3.4).
Very interesting. If I knew that I'd forgotten, and it IS a good thing
to know. (It's not worse than the situation with versions shared libaries
or versions of DLLs or versions of gcc, I guess.)
The fact that it's such an obscure question is a testament to Python's
design, come to think of it. You tell Python to run "spam.py" and The
Right Thing just happens: out-of-date .py programs are pulled in and
compiled as necessary, up-to-date .pyc files are just read in and used
-- we know that compilation is involved, but we almost never have to
see it. ("make"? What's that?)
Thanks for looking that up, Lloyd.
-Bill
P.S. And thanks to you all for coming. We had a dynamite evening. Too
MUCH show and tell, with a number of us now reporting "I did this with
Python", "I did that with Python". Ray's Web-test driver is a great
story -- how else could you get so far with end-to-end testing with
code fitting on two sheets of paper. (Ok, ok, printed double sided. :)
So much stuff that we ran over on time, and I weaseled out of my
presentation on byte-code disassembly -- which I'll do next time, I
promise. Maybe Ted will chair the meeting and keep me honest...
More information about the Python-talk
mailing list